Investigating University Students' Acceptance of Blended Learning during COVID-19 Pandemic

References

1. Pergola, T. M., and Walters, L. M. (2011). Evaluating Web-Based Learning Systems. Journal of Instructional Pedagogies, 5, 1-17.
2. Alharbi, S., and Drew, S. (2014). Mobile Learning-system usage: Scale development and empirical tests. International Journal of Advanced Research in Artificial Intelligence, 3(11). DOI: 10.14569/ijarai.2014.031105
3. Chiu, C. M., and Wang, E. T. G. (2008). Understanding Web-based learning continuance intention: The role of subjective task value. Information & Management, 45 (3), 194-201. DOI: 10.1016/j.im.2008.02.003
4. Jong, D. and Wang, T. S. (2009, May). Student acceptance of web-based learning system. In Proceedings of the 2009 International Symposium on Web Information Systems and Applications (WISA'09), (Vol. 8, pp. 533-536). People's Republic of China: Nanchang.
5. Liao, Q., Shim, J. P. and Luo, X. (2004). Student acceptance of web-based learning environment: An empirical investigation of an undergraduate IS course. AMCIS 2004 Proceedings, 377
6. Calisir, F., Altin Gumussoy, C., Bayraktaroglu, A. E., and Karaali, D. (2014). Predicting the Intention to Use a Web-Based Learning System: Perceived Content Quality, Anxiety, Perceived System Quality, Image, and the Technology Acceptance Model. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries, 24 (5), 515-531. DOI: 10.1002/hfm.20548
7. Chen, H. R., and Tseng, H.-F. (2012). Factors that influence acceptance of web-based e-learning systems for the in-service education of junior high school teachers in Taiwan. Evaluation and Program Planning, 35 (3), 398-406. DOI: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2011.11.007
8. Lwoga, E. T. (2014). Critical success factors for adoption of web-based learning management systems in Tanzania. International Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology, 10 (1), pp. 4-21
9. Pituch, K. A., & Lee, Y. (2006). The influence of system characteristics on e-learning use. Computers & Education, 47 (2), 222-244. DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2004.10.00
10. Tarhini, A., Hone, K., & Liu, X. (2013). User Acceptance Towards Web-based Learning Systems: Investigating the Role of Social, Organizational and Individual Factors in European Higher Education. Procedia Computer Science, 17, 189-197. DOI: 10.1016/j.procs.2013.05.026
11. Fathema, N., Shannon, D., & Ross, M. (2015). Expanding the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) to examine faculty use of learning management systems (LMSs) in higher education institutions. Journal of Online Learning & Teaching, 11 (2), 1145-1158.
12. Scherer, R., Siddiq, F., & Tondeur, J. (2019). The technology acceptance model (TAM): A meta-analytic structural equation modeling approach to explaining teachers' adoption of digital technology in education. Computers & Education, 25(3), 13-35.
13. Jung, M. L. L., Loria, K., & Saha, R. M. P. (2008). E-Learning: Investigating University Student s Acceptance of Technology. European Journal of Open, Distance and e-learning, 11 (2), 13-35.
14. DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (2003). The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: a ten-year update. Journal of management information systems, 19(4), 9-30.
15. Seddon, P., and Kiew, M. Y. (1996). A partial test and development of DeLone and McLean's model of IS success. Australasian Journal of Information Systems, 4 (1). pp. 90-109. DOI: 10.3127/ajis.v4i1.379
16. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319. DOI: 10.2307/249008
17. Venkatesh, V. and Davis, F. D. (1996). A Model of the Antecedents of Perceived Ease of Use: Development and Test. Decision Sciences, 27(3), 451-481.
18. Venkatesh, Morris, Davis, and Davis. (2003). User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425. DOI: 10.2307/30036540
19. DeLone, W. H., and McLean, E. R. (1992). Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variable. Information Systems Research, 3 (1), 60-95. DOI: 10.1287/isre.3.1.60
20. Chau, P. Y. K. (1996). An Empirical Assessment of a Modified Technology Acceptance Model. Journal of Management Information Systems, 13 (2), 185-204. DOI: 10.1080/07421222.1996.11518128
21. Gefen, D., and Straub, D. (2000). The Relative Importance of Perceived Ease of Use in IS Adoption: A Study of E-Commerce Adoption. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 1 (1), 1-30. doi: 10.17705/1jais.00008
22. George, D. and Mallery, M. (2003). Using SPSS for Windows step by step: a simple guide and reference. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
23. Hinkle DE, Wiersma W, and Jurs S. G.(2003). Applied Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences. 5th ed. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
24. Zalat MM, Hamed MS, Bolbol SA (2021) The experiences, challenges, and acceptance of e-learning as a tool for teaching during the COVID-19 pandemic among university medical staff. PLoS ONE 16(3): e0248758. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248758
25. Adel, A., Dayan, J. (2021). Towards an intelligent blended system of learning activities model for New Zealand institutions: an investigative approach. Humanit Soc Sci Commun 8, 72(2021). DOI: 10.1057/s41599-020-00696-4
26. Mailizar, M., Burg, D. & Maulina, S. (2021). Examining university students' behavioural intention to use e-learning during the COVID-19 pandemic: An extended TAM model. Educ Inf Technol 26, 7057-7077. DOI: 10.1007/s10639-021-10557-5