International Transaction Journal of Engineering, Management, & Applied Sciences & Technologies

Archives

TuEngr+Logo
:: International Transaction Journal of Engineering, Management, & Applied Sciences & Technologies

http://TuEngr.com



ISSN 2228-9860
eISSN 1906-9642
CODEN: ITJEA8


FEATURE PEER-REVIEWED ARTICLE

Vol.12(13) (2021)

  • Students' Attitudes at the University of Jeddah Towards E-Tests

    Ibraheem Alharbi (Department of Information Systems Management, University of Jeddah, Jeddah, SAUDI ARABIA),
    Somaya A. Ahmed (Department of Psychology, University of Jeddah, Jeddah, SAUDI ARABIA),
    Ferial M Alhaj-Mahmoud (Department of Psychology, University of Jeddah, Jeddah, SAUDI ARABIA).

    Disciplinary: Education (Machine Learning), Wireless Communication (Antenna Parameters Optimization).

    ➤ FullText

    doi: 10.14456/ITJEMAST.2021.268

    Keywords: Attitude, Electronic Evaluation, E-Tests, Demographic Variables.

    Abstract
    This study identifies students' attitudes at the University of Jeddah towards e- tests in view of variables of scientific specialization, gender, and academic level. To achieve this objective, the comparative descriptive approach was used. In addition, the Aptitudes Scale toward E-tests was applied to a sample of 1294 male and female students at the University of Jeddah from the second to the eighth level in different colleges. The ages ranged from 18 to 22 years selected by the random stratified method of those who underwent e-tests during the academic year 2019-2020. The findings revealed that there is an average attitude among the study sample towards electronic tests. There were statistically significant differences in the attitude towards electronic tests according to gender, the dimension of student's self, and the dimension of test administration in favor of males. Also, the dimension of the test content, the dimension of electronic tests nature, and on the scale as a whole in favor of females. Furthermore, there were differences in the attitude towards electronic tests according to specialization on the dimension of the student self, the dimension of the test content, the dimension of the nature of electronic tests, and on the scale as a whole in favor of scientific specialization. In addition, there were no differences in the attitudes towards electronic tests according to academic level on the four dimensions and the scale as a whole. Also, there were no differences in the attitude towards electronic tests according to age, on the dimensions, and on the scale as a whole. In light of the research findings, several recommendations were presented.

    Paper ID: 12A13P

    Cite this article:

    Alharbi, I., Ahmed, S. A. and Alhaj-Mahmoud, F.M. (2021). Students' Attitudes at the University of Jeddah Towards E-Tests. International Transaction Journal of Engineering, Management, & Applied Sciences & Technologies, 12(13), 12A13P, 1-16. http://doi.org/10.14456/ITJEMAST.2021.268



References

  1. Ahmed, E. (2010). The effectiveness of computerized tests in the educational process (applied study). Master's thesis, College of Education, Khartoum: Sudan University of Science and Technology.
  2. Hassan, K., and Al Maree, M. (2014). Attitudes of faculty members and students of the College of Education at Najran University. Erasure of the electronic test: An exploratory study, Journal of Gulf and Arabian Peninsula Studies, 42(193), 17-51.
  3. Hassanein, K. (2017). Open education studentsí attitudes towards electronic tests. Journal of the International Institute for Study and Research, 3(3), 24-31
  4. Al-Khazi, F., and Al-Zakari, M. (2011). Equalizing electronic tests with paper tests in measuring academic achievement: An empirical study on students of the College of Education at Kuwait University. Journal of Gulf and Arabian Peninsula Studies, 143 , 1-32.
  5. Salama, A. H. (2004). Communication and technology in education. Amman: Dar Al-Fikr for Publishing and Distribution.
  6. Shehadeh, N. (2003). Towards a new Arab university strategy, Conference on the Role of Arab Universities in Promoting Arab Identity. The thirty-sixth meeting of the Council of the Association of Arab Universities. Qatar University. 4-10/6/2003.
  7. Abdul Rahman, S. (1998 AD). Psychometric Theory and Application. Cairo: Dar Al-Fikr Fouda,
  8. Bawarith, R, Abdullah, B. , Anas, F. & Gamalel-Din , S.(2017). E-exam Cheating Detection System. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications. 8(4), 176-181.
  9. Bayazit, A. Askar, P. (2012). Performance and duration differences between online and paper-pencil tests, Asia Pacific Educ. Rev. 13, 219-226.
  10. Berg, R. & Lu, Y. (2014). Student attitudes towards using Moodle as a course management system. International Conference on Recreation and Leisure Industry & Language Application.
  11. Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. New York: Harcourt, Brace, & Janovich. Psychology and Marketing. 12, 459-466.
  12. Embreson. S., Reise. S. (2000). Item response theory for psychologists. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  13. Fendler, R. J., Yates, M. C., & Godbey, M. (2018) . Observing and Deterring Social Cheating on College Exams. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 12, 1, 1-17.
  14. Hambleton, R. & Swaminathan, H. (1985). Item response theory principles and applications. Boston: Kluwer Nijhoff Publishing.
  15. James, R. (2016). Tertiary student attitudes to invigilated, online summative examinations, International Journal of Educational Technology, 13(19), 2-13.
  16. Kuikka, M., Kitola, M. & Laakso, M. (2014). Challenges when introducing electronic exam. Research in Learning Technology. 22. 1-17.
  17. Masters.G. N. (1982). A Rasch Model for Partial Credit Scoring. Psychometrika, 47, 149-174.
  18. O'Keefe, D.J. (2002). Persuasion theory and research. Newbuy Park, CA: Sage.
  19. Park, R. K.(1983). Application of a grade response model to the assessment of job satisfaction. Doctoral dissertation. University of Illinois at Urbana- Champaign.
  20. Samejima, F.(1997). Graded response model. In W. J. van der Linden & R. K. Hambleton (Eds). Handbook of modern item response theory (pp. 85-100). New York: Springer-Verlag.
  21. Stowell, J. R., & Bennett, D. (2010). Effects of online testing on student exam performance and test anxiety. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 42(2), 161-171
  22. Yazdi, S. M. & Zandkarimi, G. (2013). The Impact of E-Learning on some Psychological Dimensions and Academic Achievement. International Journal of Education and Learning, 22, 49-56.


Other issues:
Vol.13(1)(2021)
Vol.12(12)(2021)
Vol.12(11)(2021)
Archives




Call-for-Papers

Call-for-Scientific Papers
Call-for-Research Papers:
ITJEMAST invites you to submit high quality papers for full peer-review and possible publication in areas pertaining engineering, science, management and technology, especially interdisciplinary/cross-disciplinary/multidisciplinary subjects.

To publish your work in the next available issue, your manuscripts together with copyright transfer document signed by all authors can be submitted via email to Editor @ TuEngr.com (no space between). (please see all detail from Instructions for Authors)


Publication and peer-reviewed process:
After the peer-review process (4-10 weeks), articles will be on-line published in the available next issue. However, the International Transaction Journal of Engineering, Management, & Applied Sciences & Technologies cannot guarantee the exact publication time as the process may take longer time, subject to peer-review approval and adjustment of the submitted articles.