International Transaction Journal of Engineering, Management, & Applied Sciences & Technologies


:: International Transaction Journal of Engineering, Management, & Applied Sciences & Technologies TuEngr+QR-Code

ISSN 2228-9860
eISSN 1906-9642


Vol.12(7) (2021)


  1. Andersen, J. F. (1979). Teacher immediacy: A predictor of teaching effectiveness. In D. Nimmo (Ed.), Communication yearbook 3 (pp. 543-559). New Brunswick, NJ Transaction.
  2. Andersen, J., Andersen, P., & Jensen, A. (1979). The measurement of nonverbal immediacy. Journal of Applied Communications Research, 7(2), 153.
  3. Anderson, C. M., & Martin, M. M. (1999). The relationship of argumentativeness and verbal aggressiveness to cohesion, consensus, and satisfaction in small groups. Communication Reports, 12, 21-31.
  4. Brawley, L. R., Carron, A. V., & Widmeyer, W. N. (1987). Assessing the cohesion of teams: Validity of the Group Environmental Questionnaire. Journal of Sport Psychology, 2, 275-294.
  5. Christophel, D. M. (1990). The relationships among teacher immediacy behaviors, student motivation, and learning. Communication Education, 39, 323-340.
  6. Comstock, J., & Rowell, E. (1995). Food for thought: Teacher nonverbal immediacy, student learning, and curvilinearity. Communication Education, 44(3), 251.
  7. Creswell, J.W. (2003). Research Design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approach. 2nd Ed., Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  8. Folwell, A. L. (2000). A comparison of professors' and students' perceptions of nonverbal immediacy behaviors. Journal of the Northwest Communication Association, 29, 41-58.
  9. Keaten, J. A., Pribyl, C. B., & Sakamoto, M. (2004). The relationship between nonverbal immediacy, student motivation, and perceived cognitive learning among Japanese college students. Japanese Psychological Research, 46(2), 73-85.
  10. Levine, K., & Violanti, M. (2008). Rating my group members and their rating of me: Is there a relationship between ratings, social loafing and group cohesion? Paper presented at the National Communication Association Conference, 1-28.
  11. McBride, M. C. (2006). "-ing" project: Encouraging cohesion in small groups. Communication Teacher, 30, 53-66.
  12. Mehrabian, A. (1971). Silent messages. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Company.
  13. Myers, S. A., Shimotsu, S., Byrnes, K., Frisby, B. N., Durbin, J., & Loy, B. N. (2010). Assessing the role of peer relationships in the small group communication course. Communication Teacher, 24, 43-57.
  14. Park, H. S., Lee, S. A., Yun, D., & Kim, W. (2009). The impact of instructor decision authority and verbal and nonverbal immediacy on Korean student satisfaction in the US and South Korea. Communication Education, 58(2), 189-212. DOI: 10.1080/03634520802450531
  15. Pogue, L.L., & AhYun, K. (2006). The effect of teacher nonverbal immediacy and credibility on student motivation and effective learning. Communication Education, 55(3), 331-344.
  16. Richmond, V., McCroskey, J., & Johnson, A. (2003). Development of the nonverbal immediacy scale (NIS): Measures of self- and other-perceived nonverbal immediacy. Communication Quarterly, 51(4), 504-517.
  17. Rosenfeld, L. B., & Gilbert, J. R. (1989). The measurement of cohesion and its relationship to dimensions of self-disclosure in classroom settings. Small Group Behavior, 20, 291-301.
  18. Sanders, J. A., & Wiseman, R. L. (1990). The effects of verbal and nonverbal teacher immediacy on perceived cognitive, affective and behavioral learning in the multicultural classroom. Communication Education, 39, 341-353.
  19. Simons, M. E., & de Ridder, J. A. (2004). Renewing connections and changing relations: Use of information and communication technology and cohesion in organizational groups. Communications, 29, 159-177.
  20. Turman, P. D. (2008). Coaches' immediacy behaviors as predictors of athletes' perceptions of satisfaction and team cohesion. Western Journal of Communication, 72(2), 162-179. DOI: 10.1080/10570310802038424
  21. Weinberg, S. B. (1979). Measurement of communication aspects of group cohesion. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 7, 55-60.
  22. Widmeyer, W. N., Brawley, L. R., & Carron, A. V. (1985). The measurement of cohesion in sport teams: The group environment questionnaire. London, Ontario: Sport Dynamics.
  23. Wrench, J. S., Thomas-Maddox, C., Richmond, V. P., & McCroskey, J. C. (2008). Quantitative research methods for communication: A hands-on approach. New York: Oxford University Press.

Other issues:


Call-for-Scientific Papers
Call-for-Research Papers: ITJEMAST invites you to submit high quality papers for full peer-review and possible publication in areas pertaining engineering, science, management and technology, especially interdisciplinary/cross-disciplinary/multidisciplinary subjects.

To publish your work in the next available issue, your manuscripts together with copyright transfer document signed by all authors can be submitted via email to Editor @ (no space between). (please see all detail from Instructions for Authors)

Publication and peer-reviewed process:
After the peer-review process (4-10 weeks), articles will be on-line published in the available next issue. However, the International Transaction Journal of Engineering, Management, & Applied Sciences & Technologies cannot guarantee the exact publication time as the process may take longer time, subject to peer-review approval and adjustment of the submitted articles.