Bhattraradej Witchayangkoon (Department of Civil Engineering, Thammasat School of Engineering, Thammasat University, Rangsit, Pathumtani, THAILAND), and
Kritsada Anantakarn (Faculty of Engineering and Architecture, Rajamangala University of Technology Tawan-ok, Uthenthawai Campus, Bangkok, THAILAND).
Discipline: Multidisciplinary (Research publishing).
➤ FullText
doi: 10.14456/ITJEMAST.2025.14
Keywords: Academic Publishing; Scopus journal; APC; DORA; JIF; Q1 journal; Q2 journal; Q3 journal; Q4 journal; CiteScore; Research assessment; Journal-level metrics; Scientific quality; SNIP; Ranked journal; SJR; Article-level metrics; Journal-based metrics; SCImago; Journal Rank; Gaming citation metrics; Altmetrics; Incentive research; Fee-driven incentive of APC; Salami slicing of research; Publish-or-perish; OA.
Abstract
This study uses the economic idea of the "Cobra Effect," which describes how a good-intentioned incentive can actually worsen a problem rather than improve it, in relation to the current landscape of academic publishing. We argue that the intense pressure on researchers to publish in Q1-Q4 Scopus®-indexed journals exemplifies the Cobra Effect. The goal of this incentive was to promote high-quality research, but instead, it has resulted in an excessive number of publications - the academic equivalent of breeding cobras. This situation, influenced by how institutions assess researchers and their career advancement, acts like a modern bounty. Consequently, this has triggered a series of negative outcomes akin to breeding cobras for a reward, including the emergence of predatory journals, fragmenting research into smaller parts, citation cartels, and exploiting Article Processing Charge (APC) models. This scenario has overwhelmed the publishing system, reduced the significance of genuine scientific achievements, and introduced various new challenges. The global academic community now faces the task of learning from this narrative. The unforeseen consequences include a drop in scientific quality, loss of trust, a lot of wasted money, and burnout among researchers. They must shift away from rewarding the mere act of producing a "dead cobra" (a publication in a ranked journal) and instead focus on what really matters: fostering a healthy, reliable, and impactful scientific environment. Fixing this systemic issue needs a major change from focusing on journal-level metrics to assessing articles on an individual basis (article-level metrics (altmetrics)) and following the principles outlined in the San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment (DORA).
Paper ID: 16A2G
Cite this article:
Witchayangkoon, B., and Anantakarn, K. (2025). The Academic Cobra Effect: Perverse Incentives and Unintended Consequences of Metric-driven Research Publishing. International Transaction Journal of Engineering, Management, & Applied Sciences & Technologies, 16(2), 16A2G, 1-13. http://doi.org/10.14456/ITJEMAST.2025.14