Effect of Crumb Rubber on Properties of High-Calcium Fly Ash Geopolymer Mortars

References

1. AbdelAleem, B. H., Ismail, M. K., & Hassan, A. A. (2018). The combined effect of crumb rubber and synthetic fibers on impact resistance of self-consolidating concrete. Construction and Building Materials, 162, 816-829.
2. Abdelmonem, A., El-Feky, M. S., Nasr, E. S. A., & Kohail, M. (2019). Performance of high strength concrete containing recycled rubber. Construction and Building Materials, 227, 116660.
3. Adam, A. A., & Horianto, X. X. X. (2014). The effect of temperature and duration of curing on the strength of fly ash based geopolymer mortar. Procedia engineering, 95, 410-414.
4. Alsaif, A., Bernal, S. A., Guadagnini, M., & Pilakoutas, K. (2018). Durability of steel fibre reinforced rubberised concrete exposed to chlorides. Construction and Building Materials, 188, 130-142.
5. Ameri, F., Shoaei, P., Musaeei, H. R., Zareei, S. A., & Cheah, C. B. (2020). Partial replacement of copper slag with treated crumb rubber aggregates in alkali-activated slag mortar. Construction and Building Materials, 256, 119468.
6. Aslani, F., Ma, G., Wan, D. L. Y., & Muselin, G. (2018). Development of high-performance self-compacting concrete using waste recycled concrete aggregates and rubber granules. Journal of Cleaner Production, 182, 553-566.
7. ASTM C109/C109M-16a. (2016). Standard Test Method for Compressive Strength of hydraulic Cement Mortarss (Using 2-in. or [50-mm] Cube Specimens). ASTM International, West Conshohocken, United States.
8. ASTM C136/C136M-19. (2019). Standard Test Method for Sieve Analysis of Fine and Coarse Aggregate. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, United States.
9. ASTM C1611/C1611M-18. (2018). Standard Test Method for Slump Flow of Self-Consolidating Concrete. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, United States.
10. ASTM C642-13. (2013). Standard Test Method for Density, Absorption, and Voids in Hardened Concrete. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, United States.
11. ASTM C936/C936M-21. (2021). Standard Specification for Solid Concrete Interlocking Paving Units. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, United States.
12. Bala, A., & Gupta, S. (2021). Thermal resistivity, sound absorption and vibration damping of concrete composite doped with waste tire Rubber: A review. Construction and Building Materials, 299, 123939.
13. Benazzouk, A., Mezreb, K., Doyen, G., Goullieux, A., & Queneudec, M. (2003). Effect of rubber aggregates on the physico-mechanical behaviour of cement-rubber composites-influence of the alveolar texture of rubber aggregates. Cement and Concrete Composites, 25(7), 711-720.
14. Diaz-Loya, E. I., Allouche, E. N., & Vaidya, S. (2011). Mechanical properties of fly-ash-based geopolymer concrete. ACI materials journal, 108(3), 300.
15. Dong, M., Elchalakani, M., Karrech, A., & Yang, B. (2021). Strength and durability of geopolymer concrete with high volume rubber replacement. Construction and Building Materials, 274, 121783.
16. Hwang, C. L., & Huynh, T. P. (2015). Effect of alkali-activator and rice husk ash content on strength development of fly ash and residual rice husk ash-based geopolymers. Construction and Building Materials, 101, 1-9.
17. Jindal, B. B. (2019). Investigations on the properties of geopolymer mortar and concrete with mineral admixtures: A review. Construction and building materials, 227, 116644.
18. Kong, D. L., & Sanjayan, J. G. (2010). Effect of elevated temperatures on geopolymer paste, mortar and concrete. Cement and concrete research, 40(2), 334-339.
19. Lv, J., Zhou, T., Du, Q., & Wu, H. (2015). Effects of rubber particles on mechanical properties of lightweight aggregate concrete. Construction and Building Materials, 91, 145-149.
20. Mohsin, A. I., & Fahad, B. M. (2015). Improve the acoustic impedance and thermal conductivity of mortar by adding recycled rubber. Journal of Modern Engineering Research, 5, 9-16.
21. Moustafa, A., & ElGawady, M. A. (2015). Mechanical properties of high strength concrete with scrap tire rubber. Construction and Building Materials, 93, 249-256.
22. Munoz-Sanchez, B., Arevalo-Caballero, M. J., & Pacheco-Menor, M. C. (2017). Influence of acetic acid and calcium hydroxide treatments of rubber waste on the properties of rubberized mortars. Materials and Structures, 50(1), 1-16.
23. Nuaklong, P., Janprasit, K., & Jongvivatsakul, P. (2021b). Enhancement of strengths of high-calcium fly ash geopolymer containing borax with rice husk ash. Journal of Building Engineering, 40, 102762.
24. Nuaklong, P., Worawatnalunart, P., Jongvivatsakul, P., Tangaramvong, S., Pothisiri, T., & Likitlersuang, S. (2021a). Pre-and post-fire mechanical performances of high calcium fly ash geopolymer concrete containing granite waste. Journal of Building Engineering, 44, 103265.
25. Park, Y., Abolmaali, A., Kim, Y. H., & Ghahremannejad, M. (2016). Compressive strength of fly ash-based geopolymer concrete with crumb rubber partially replacing sand. Construction and Building Materials, 118, 43-51.
26. Pham, T. M., Elchalakani, M., Hao, H., Lai, J., Ameduri, S., & Tran, T. M. (2019). Durability characteristics of lightweight rubberized concrete. Construction and Building Materials, 224, 584-599.
27. Pham, T. M., Lim, Y. Y., & Malekzadeh, M. (2021). Effect of pre-treatment methods of crumb rubber on strength, permeability and acid attack resistance of rubberised geopolymer concrete. Journal of Building Engineering, 41, 102448.
28. Sharaky, I. A., Mohamed, H. A., Torres, L., & Emara, M. (2020). Flexural behavior of rubberized concrete beams strengthened in shear using welded wire mesh. Composite Structures, 247, 112485.
29. Sodupe-Ortega, E., Fraile-Garcia, E., Ferreiro-Cabello, J., & Sanz-Garcia, A. (2016). Evaluation of crumb rubber as aggregate for automated manufacturing of rubberized long hollow blocks and bricks. Construction and Building materials, 106, 305-316.
30. Youssf, O., Hassanli, R., & Mills, J. E. (2017). Mechanical performance of FRP-confined and unconfined crumb rubber concrete containing high rubber content. Journal of Building Engineering, 11, 115-126.