:: International Transaction Journal of Engineering, Management, & Applied Sciences & Technologies
http://TuEngr.com
ISSN 2228-9860
eISSN 1906-9642
CODEN: ITJEA8
FEATURE PEER-REVIEWED ARTICLE
Vol.11(12) (2020) |
Albina Luneva (Department of Parasitology, Veterinary Examination and Pet Hygiene, Kuban State Agrarian University named after I.T. Trubilin, RUSSIA),
Andrei Koshchayev (Department of Biotechnology, Biochemistry and Biophysics, Kuban State Agrarian University named after I.T. Trubilin, RUSSIA),
Anton Nesterenko (Department of Technology for Storage and Processing of Livestock Products, Kuban State Agrarian University named after I.T. Trubilin, RUSSIA),
Elena Volobueva, Alexey Boyko (Department of Biotechnology, Biochemistry and Biophysics, Kuban State Agrarian University named after I.T. Trubilin, RUSSIA).
Disciplinary: Microbiology, Biotechnology, Animal Science, MicrobioScience.
DOI: 10.14456/ITJEMAST.2020.230
Keywords: Lactobacilli; Antagonism; Opportunistic microorganisms; Pathogenic microorganisms; Test culture; Lactobacillus parabuchneri; Lactobacillus Brevis.
Paper ID: 11A12E
Cite this article:
Luneva, A., Koshchayev, A., Nesterenko, A., Volobueva, E., Boyko, A. (2020). PROBIOTIC POTENTIAL OF MICROORGANISMS OBTAINED FROM THE INTESTINES OF WILD BIRDS. International Transaction Journal of Engineering, Management, & Applied Sciences & Technologies, 11(12), 11A12E, 1-9. DOI: 10.14456/ITJEMAST.2020.230
References:
[1] Chervynets Yu.V. (2006). Bacteriocinogenic highly antagonistic strains of lactobacilli. Microbiology. 7, 78-82.
[2] Glushanova N.A., Blinov A.I., Bakhaev V.V. (2004). On the antagonism of probiotic lactobacilli. Epidemiology and infectious diseases. 6, 37.
[3] Zaborskikh E.I. (1976). Antagonistic activity of mesophilic lactic streptococci and their experimental selection. Irkutsk, Russia, 28 p.
[4] Lysenko Yu.A., Shuvaeva T.M., Radchenko V.V., Ilnitskaya E.V., Koshchaev A.G. (2015). Intensification of poultry using probiotic feed additives. Veterinary medicine of Kuban. 5, 7-10.
[5] Irkitova A.N., Kagan Ya. R., Sergeeva I. Ya. (2011). Properties, environmental aspects and practical importance of acidophilus bacillus. Actual problems of machinery and technology for milk processing. Vol. 8, 222-230.
[6] Guidelines for the sanitary-epidemiological assessment of the safety and functional potential of probiotic microorganisms used for food production (2011). Moscow, Russia, 104 p.
[7] Lysenko Yu.A., Luneva A.V., Volkova S.A., Nikolaenko S.N., Petrova V.V. (2014). Selection of the optimal nutrient medium for the cultivation, concentration and drying of Lactobacillus acidophilus cells. Political Internet electronic scientific journal of the Kuban State Agrarian University. 102, 689-699.
[8] Netrusova A.I. (2005). Workshop on microbiology. Moscow, Russia, 608 p.
[9] Koshchaev A.G., Lysenko Yu.A., Luneva A.V., Likhoman A.V. (2015). Probiotic feed supplement for feeding quail. Zootechnics. 10, 4-6.
[10] Luneva A. V., Lysenko Yu. A., Koshchaev A. G., Nesterenko A. A., Guzenko V. I. (2019).
Comprehensive biosafety assessment of additives based on live microorganisms. International Journal of Engineering and Advance Technology. 9(1), 2477-2483.
[11] Cox C. M., Dalloul R. A. (2015). Immunomodulatory role of probiotics in poultry and potential in ovo application. C. Benefic Microbes. 6, 45-50.
[12] Su H. (2014). Cultivable bacterial microbiota of northern bobwhite (Colinus virginianus): a new reservoir of antimicrobial resistance? PLoS ONE. 9(6).
[13] Lysenko Y., Luneva A., Koshchaev A., Lifentsova M., Gorpinchenko E. (2019). Quality assessment of biological product of microbial origin. International Journal of Engineering and Technology, 9(1), 2484-2488.
Other issues:
Vol.11(12)(2020)
Vol.11(11)(2020)
Vol.11(10)(2020)
Vol.11(9)(2020)
Vol.11(8)(2020)
Vol.11(7)(2020)
Vol.11(6)(2020)
Vol.11(5)(2020)
Vol.11(4)(2020)
Vol.11(3)(2020)
Vol.11(2)(2020)
Vol.11(1)(2020)
Archives