International Transaction Journal of Engineering,
Management, & Applied Sciences & Technologies

Archives

TuEngr+Logo
:: International Transaction Journal of Engineering, Management, & Applied Sciences & Technologies

http://TuEngr.com



ISSN 2228-9860
eISSN 1906-9642
CODEN: ITJEA8


FEATURE PEER-REVIEWED ARTICLE

Vol.11(13) (2020)

  • BEHAVIORAL PERSPECTIVES AMONG DIVIDEND POLICY AND ITS DETERMINANTS AND FIRM'S FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE: A CB-SEM APPROACH

    Sarfaraz Ahmed Bhutto, Hassan Jawad Soomro, Saifullah Shaikh (Institute of Commerce, Shah Abdul Latif University Khairpur, Sindh, PAKISTAN),
    Hussain Amar ( Government Islamia Arts & Commerce College, Sukkur, Sindh, PAKISTAN),
    Qamar Abbas Mangi (Institute of Commerce, Shah Abdul Latif University Khairpur, Sindh, PAKISTAN).

    Disciplinary: Management and Financial Sciences.

    ➤ FullText

    DOI: 10.14456/ITJEMAST.2020.257

    Keywords: Effective dividend policy, Company's financial performance, SEM analysis; Stakeholders' interests; Structural Equation Modeling (SEM); Chief financial officer (CFO); Corporate finance; Anticipated level of future earnings; Patterns of past of dividends; Financial uncertainty; Manufacturing firms.

    Abstract
    Dividend policy is the prime concern for every shareholder. Financial managers formulate the necessary dividend policy that increases shareholders' affinity towards the company. This study examines the relationship between determinants of dividend policy (anticipated level of future earnings, stakeholders' interest, the pattern of past dividends, corporate social responsibility (CSR), and uncertainty) and financial performance. Moreover, this study empirically investigates the untapped mediating effect of dividend policy between determinants of dividend policy and financial performance. Financial managers are highly integrated into formulating dividend policy, the present study indulged with the behavioral responses taken from Chief financial officers (CFOs) of listed manufacturing firms of Pakistan. Questionnaires are used as a study tool. The population frame includes CFOs of different financial and non-financial sectors. From the Covariance-based Structural Equation Modelling (CB-SEM) analysis, results show a significant relationship between the determinants of dividend policy and financial performance. Further, dividend policy mediates the relationship between its determinants (except uncertainty and CSR) and the firm's financial performance. The practical implication would be recommended for financial managers and other corporate policymakers.

    Paper ID: 11A13K

    Cite this article:

    Bhutto, S.A., Soomro, H.J., Shaikh, S., Amar, H., Mangi, Q.A. (2020). BEHAVIORAL PERSPECTIVES AMONG DIVIDEND POLICY AND ITS DETERMINANTS AND FIRM'S FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE: A CB-SEM APPROACH. International Transaction Journal of Engineering, Management, & Applied Sciences & Technologies, 11(13), 11A13K, 1-12.



    References:

    Amidu, M. (2007). How does dividend policy affect the performance of the firm on Ghana Stock Exchange? Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 4(2), 103-112.

    Ayuso, S., Rodriguez, M.A., Garcia-Castro, R., & Arino, M.A. (2014). Maximizing stakeholders' interests: An empirical analysis of the stakeholder approach to corporate governance. Business & Society, 53(3), 414-439. DOI:10.1177/ 0007650311433122

    Bae, K.H., Kang, J.K., & Wang, J. (2011). Employee treatment and firm leverage: A test of the stakeholder theory of capital structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 100(1), 130-153. DOI:10.1016/j.jfineco.2010.10.019

    Baker, H.K., Farrelly, G.E., Edelman, R.B. (1985). A Survey of Management Views on Dividend Policy. Financial Management, 14(3), 78-84.

    Bond, M.T., Mougoue, M. (1991). Corporate Dividend Policy and the Partial Adjustment Model. Journal of Economics and Business, 43(2), 165-178.

    Brine, M., Brown, R., & Hackett, G. (2007). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance in the Australian context. Economic Round-Up, 2, 47-58.

    Capon, N., Farley, J.U., & Hoenig, S. (1990). Determinants of financial performance: A meta-analysis. Management Science, 36(10), 1143-1159. DOI:10.1287/mnsc.36.10.1143

    Chay, J.B., & Suh, J. (2009). Payout policy and cash-flow uncertainty. Journal of Financial Economics, 93(1), 88-107. DOI: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2008.12.001

    Chih, H.H., Miao, W.C., & Chuang, Y.C. (2014). Is corporate social responsibility a double-edged sword? Evidence from fortune global 500 companies. Journal of Management, 31(1), 1-19.

    Cochran, P.L., & Wood, R.A. (1984). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance. Academy of Management Journal, 27(1), 42-56.

    Cua, K.O., McKone, K.E., & Schroeder, R.G. (2001). Relationships between the implementation of TQM, JIT, and TPM and manufacturing performance. Journal of Operations Management, 19(6), 675-694. DOI:10.1016/S0272-6963(01)00066-3

    DeAngelo, H., DeAngelo, L., & Skinner, D. J. (1996). Reversal of fortune dividend signaling and the disappearance of sustained earnings growth. Journal of Financial Economics, 40(3), 341-371. DOI:10.1016/ 0304-405X(95)00850-E

    Dixit, A.K., Dixit, R.K., Pindyck, R.S., & Pindyck, R. (1994). Investment under uncertainty. Princeton University Press.

    Fama, E.F. (1974). The Empirical Relationship Between the Dividend and Investment Decisions of Firms. American Economic Review, 64(3), 304-318.

    Farrelly, G.E. and Baker, H.K. (1989). Corporate Dividends: Views of Institutional Investors. Akron Business and Economic Review, 20(2), 89-100.

    Farrelly, G.E., Baker, H.K., Edelman, R.B. (1986). Corporate Dividends: Views of the Policymakers. Akron Business and Economic Review, 17(4), 62-74.

    Fornell, C., & Larcker, D.F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50. DOI:10.1177/002224378101800104

    Freeman, R.E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston, MA: Pitman.

    Freeman, R.E., Wicks, A.C., & Parmar, B. (2004). Stakeholder theory and the corporate objective revisited. Organization Science, 15(3), 364-369. DOI: 10.1287/orsc.1040.0066

    Friedman, A.L., & Miles, S. (2006). Stakeholders: Theory and practice. Oxford University Press.

    Fukuda, A. (2000). Dividend changes and earnings performance in Japan. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 8 (1), 53-66. DOI:10.1016/S0927-538X(99)00024-4

    Ghosh, C. and J.R. Woolridge, 1988, An Analysis of Shareholder Reaction to Dividend Cuts and Omissions. Journal of Financial Research, 11(4), 281-294.

    Grullon, G., Michaely, R., Benartzi, S., & Thaler, R.H. (2005). Dividend changes do not signal changes in future profitability. The Journal of Business, 78(5), 1659-1682. DOI:10.1086/jb.2005.78.issue-5

    Hair, J.F., Anderson, R.E., Tatham, R.L., & Black, W.C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis. 5th Ed. Prentice-Hall International.

    Harash, E., Alsaadi, J., & Al-Timimi, S. (2014). Financial performance of SMEs - Evidence on the influence of environmental uncertainty: A conceptual framework. China-USA Business Review, 13(8), 540-545.

    Harjoto, M.A., & Jo, H. (2015). Legal vs. normative CSR: Differential impact on analyst dispersion, stock return volatility, cost of capital, and firm value. Journal of Business Ethics, 128(1), 1-20. DOI:10.1007/ s10551-014-2082-2

    Hirigoyen, G., & Poulain-Rehim, T. (2015). Relationships between corporate social responsibility and financial performance: What is the causality? Journal of Business and Management, 4(1), 18-43.

    Hoang, E. C., & Hoxha, I. (2016). Corporate payout smoothing: A variance decomposition approach. Journal of Empirical Finance, 35, 1-13. DOI:10.1016/j. jempfin.2015.10.011

    Ittner, C.D., & Larcker, D.F. (2001). Assessing empirical research in managerial accounting: A value-based management perspective. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 32(1-3), 349-410. DOI:10.1016/S01654101(01)00026-X

    Jensen, M.C., & Meckling, W.H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305-360. DOI:10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X

    Kajola, S.O., Adewumi, A.A., & Oworu, O.O. (2015). Dividend pay-out policy and firm financial performance: Evidence from Nigerian listed non-financial firms. International Journal of Economics, Commerce and Management, 3(4), 1-12.

    Keramati, A., Mehrabi, H., & Mojir, N. (2010). A process-oriented perspective on customer relationship management and organizational performance: An empirical investigation. Industrial Marketing Management, 39(7), 1170-1185. DOI: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2010.02.001

    Lintner, J. 1956. Distribution of Incomes of Corporations Among Dividends, Retained Earnings and Taxes. American Economics Review, 46(2), 97-113.

    McAulay, B.J., Zeitz, G., & Blau, G. (2006). Testing a pushpull theory of work commitment among organizational professionals. The Social Science Journal, 43(4), 571-596. DOI:10.1016/j.soscij.2006.08.005

    Miller, M. H., & Modigliani, F. (1961). Dividend policy, growth, and the valuation of shares. The Journal of Business, 34(4), 411-433.

    Mitchell, R.K., Agle, B.R., & Wood, D.J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 853-886. DOI:10.5465/amr.1997.9711022105

    Nachtigall, C., Kroehne, U., Funke, F., & Steyer, R. (2003). Pros and cons of structural equation modeling. Methods Psychological Research Online, 8(2), 1-22.

    Netemeyer, R.G., Bearden, W.O., & Sharma, S. (2003). Scaling procedures: Issues and applications. Sage Publications.

    Niazi, G.S.K., Hunjra, A.I., Rashid, M., Akbar, S.W., & Akhtar, M.N. (2011). Practices of working capital policy and performance assessment financial ratios and their relationship with organization performance. World Applied Sciences Journal, 12(11), 1967-1973.

    Nissim, D., & Ziv, A. (2001). Dividend changes and future profitability. The Journal of Finance, 56(6), 2111-2133. DOI:10.1111/0022-1082.00400

    Prabhu, N.U. (2007). Stochastic processes: Basic theory and its applications. Macmillan New York.

    Roh, T.H., Ahn, C.K., & Han, I. (2005). The priority factor model for customer relationship management system success. Expert Systems with Applications, 28(4), 641-654. DOI:10.1016/j.eswa.2004.12.021

    Ross, S.A. (1977). The determination of financial structure: The incentive-signalling approach. The Bell Journal of Economics, 8(1), 23-40. DOI:10.2307/ 3003485

    Steenkamp, J.B.E, & Baumgartner, H. (2000). On the use of structural equation models for marketing modeling. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 17(2-3), 195-202. 10.1016/S0167-8116 (00)00016-1

    Torugsa, N.A., O'Donohue, W., & Hecker, R. (2012). Capabilities, proactive CSR and financial performance in SMEs: Empirical evidence from an Australian manufacturing industry sector. Journal of Business Ethics, 109(4), 483-500. DOI:10.1007/s10551-011-1141-1

    Van Beurden, P., & Gossling, T. (2008).The worth of values-A literature review on the relation between corporate social and financial performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 82(2), 407. DOI:10.1007/s10551-008-9894-x

    Walkup, B. (2016). The impact of uncertainty on payout policy. Managerial Finance, 42(11), 1054-1072. DOI:10.1108/MF-09-2015-0237



Other issues:
Vol.11(12)(2020)
Vol.11(11)(2020)
Vol.11(10)(2020)
Vol.11(9)(2020)
Vol.11(8)(2020)
Vol.11(7)(2020)
Vol.11(6)(2020)
Vol.11(5)(2020)
Vol.11(4)(2020)
Vol.11(3)(2020)
Vol.11(2)(2020)
Vol.11(1)(2020)
Archives




Call-for-Papers

Call-for-Scientific Papers
Call-for-Research Papers:
ITJEMAST invites you to submit high quality papers for full peer-review and possible publication in areas pertaining engineering, science, management and technology, especially interdisciplinary/cross-disciplinary/multidisciplinary subjects.

To publish your work in the next available issue, your manuscripts together with copyright transfer document signed by all authors can be submitted via email to Editor @ TuEngr.com (no space between). (please see all detail from Instructions for Authors)


Publication and peer-reviewed process:
After the peer-review process (4-10 weeks), articles will be on-line published in the available next issue. However, the International Transaction Journal of Engineering, Management, & Applied Sciences & Technologies cannot guarantee the exact publication time as the process may take longer time, subject to peer-review approval and adjustment of the submitted articles.