:: International Transaction Journal of Engineering, Management, & Applied Sciences & Technologies
http://TuEngr.com
ISSN 2228-9860
eISSN 1906-9642
CODEN: ITJEA8
FEATURE PEER-REVIEWED ARTICLE
Vol.11(16) (2020) |
Yuriy V. Ginzburg (Department of Financial and Business Law of Kursk State University; Federal Center for Educational Legislation, RUSSIA
).
Disciplinary: Law, History, International Policy, War and Peace.
DOI: 10.14456/ITJEMAST.2020.327
Keywords: Territory secession; War and peace; Independency process; Declaration of independence.
Paper ID: 11A16R
Cite this article:
Ginzburg, Y. V. (2020). Modern Vision of the Historical Experience of Secession Legal Registration: Cases of Norway and Finland. International Transaction Journal of Engineering, Management, & Applied Sciences & Technologies, 11(16), 11A16R, 1-9. http://doi.org/10.14456/ITJEMAST.2020.311
References:
[1] Anderson I. History of Sweden. Moscow, 1951. 375p.
[2] Borodkin M. M. From the modern history of Finland. N.I. Bobrikov's tenure. St. Petersburg, 1905.
[3] Borodkin M.M. A Brief History of Finland. St. Petersburg, 1911.
[4] Borodkin M.M. History of Finland. The time of Emperor Alexander I. St. Petersburg, 1909.
[5] Danielsen R., Durvik S., Gronli T., Helle K., Hovlann E. History of Norway. From Vikings to the present. Moscow, 2003. Pp. 233-242.
[6] Ginzburg Yu.V., Khashchina E.E. Separation of Poland and Finland from Russia: historical and legal aspects. Historical and legal problems: A new perspective. 2019.No 2.P. 123-136.
[7] Holmoyvik, Eirik. Constituent Power and Constitutionalism in 19th Century Norway // Reconsidering Constitutional Formation II Decisive Constitutional Normativity. Cham: Springer Nature, 2018. pp 275-310. http://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/28089
[8] Ilyina T. N. Evolution of the judicial functions of the Senate as the highest judicial body in Russia in the 18th century // Historical and Legal Problems. A new angle. Vol. 14.2015.
[9] Isaev M. A. Modernization of the constitution. Experience of Norway // State and Law. 2013. No. 6. Pp. 103-111.
[10] Isaev M. A. Reasons and political form of termination of the Swedish-Norwegian union // Polis. Political research. 2005. No. 6. P. 142.
[11] Kasiyan A.S. Russia and Norway: the establishment of diplomatic relations. Abstract of the dissertation of the historical sciences candidate. Moscow, 2009.P. 19
[12] Kozellek R. On the issue of temporal structures in the historical development of notions / History of notions, history of discourse, history of mentality: Collection of Articles / Ed. Hans Bedecker. Moscow, 2010, 25p.
[13] Miall, H. The peacemakers: Peaceful settlement of disputes since 1945. Palgrave Macmillan; 1992.
[14] Michalsen, Dag. Law and Politics in Swedish - Norwegian Union Law, 1814-1905 - an Elegy // Rechtsgeschichte - Legal History. 19. 2011. P. 217-219.
[15] Novikova I.N. Special state or province of the empire: Russian lawyers about the state-legal status of Finland // St. Petersburg and the countries of Northern Europe. 2002. No. 3. P. 126.
[16] Novikova I.N. The Grand Duchy of Finland in the imperial policy of Russia // The imperial system of Russia in the regional dimension (XIX - early XX century). Moscow, 1997.
[18] Popov F.A. Geography of secessionism in the modern world. ?oscow, 2012.
[19] Raymond E. Lindgren. Norway-Sweden: Union, Disunion, and Scandinavian Integration. 1959.
[20] Russia and Finland: from confrontation to peace. 1917-1920: a collection of documents. / comp. Zelenov M.V. Moscow, 2017.P. 59
[21] Sadova L.V. The Swedish-Norwegian conflict of 1905 in reports to St. Petersburg of Russian military agents (based on the materials of the Russian State Military Historical Archive) // St. Petersburg and the countries of Northern Europe. 2004. No. 5. Pp. 106-115.
[22] Schweitzer Ch., Johansen J. To Prevent Or Stop Wars. What Can Peace Movement Do? 2016. P. 21.
[23] Wikisource. The Constitution of the Kingdom of Norway. Christiania: Printed by Jacob Lehmann,1814.
[24] The manifest on the conclusion of peace between Russia and Sweden (with the application of the Treaty of Hamina, September 5/17, 1809) // CCLRE. The first collection. Volume 30. 1808-1809. St. Petersburg, 1830. No.23883.
[25] The manifest on the conquest of Swedish Finland and its accession forever to Russia // Complete collection of laws of the Russian Empire (CCLRE). The first collection. Volume 30. 1808-1809. St. Petersburg, 1830. No.22911.
[26] Timofeev D.V. The notion of "constitution" in Russia in the first quarter of XIX century. Social Sciences and the Present. 2007, No.1, 120p.
[27] Writing Democracy: the Norwegian Constitution, 1814-2014 / edited by Karen Gammelgaard and Eirik Holm?yvik. New York: Berghahn, 2015. P. 13.
Other issues:
Vol.11(14)(2020)
Vol.11(13)(2020)
Vol.11(12)(2020)
Vol.11(11)(2020)
Vol.11(10)(2020)
Vol.11(9)(2020)
Vol.11(8)(2020)
Vol.11(7)(2020)
Vol.11(6)(2020)
Vol.11(5)(2020)
Vol.11(4)(2020)
Vol.11(3)(2020)
Vol.11(2)(2020)
Vol.11(1)(2020)
Archives