:: International Transaction Journal of Engineering, Management, & Applied Sciences & Technologies
http://TuEngr.com
ISSN 2228-9860
eISSN 1906-9642
CODEN: ITJEA8
FEATURE PEER-REVIEWED ARTICLE
Vol.11(15) (2020) |
Elena N. Fokina (Department of Business Informatics and Mathematics, Tyumen Industrial University, RUSSIA
).
Disciplinary: Engineering Education (Curriculum and Learning Development).
DOI: 10.14456/ITJEMAST.2020.306
Keywords: Engineering education, information competences; CDIO, digitalization; educational environment; learning model; DigComp.
Paper ID: 11A15R
Cite this article:
Fokina, E. N. (2020). Development of Information Competencies of Engineering Students. International Transaction Journal of Engineering, Management, & Applied Sciences & Technologies, 11(15), 11A15R, 1-11. http://doi.org/10.14456/ITJEMAST.2020.306
References:
Arnautov, A. D. (2014). Building information competence of future Bachelors in Metallurgy in the process of mastering the discipline “Information Services” using a complex of information-technological tasks. Candidate Dissertation, Siberian Federal University.
Bates, T. (2015). Teaching in a digital age: Guidelines for designing teaching and learning. Burnaby, BC: SFU Document Solutions, Simon Fraser University.
BCG. (2017). From employees to talents. Boston Consulting Group Review http://image-src.bcg.com/Images/BCG_Review_November-2017_tcm27-178366.pdf
Bermus, A. G. (2014). The pedagogical component of a multilevel professionally oriented university education. Lifelong Education: The 21st Century, 1(5), 60-77. DOI: 10.15393/j5.art.2014.2281
Chuchalin, A. I. (2014). Modernization of engineering education based on international CDIO standards. Engineering Education, 16, 14-29.
Chuchalin, A. I. (2016). Application of the CDIO approach to three-level engineering program design. Higher Education in Russia, 4, 17-32.
Chuchalin, A. I., Daneykina, N. V. (2017). Application of the CDIO approach to MSc and PhD engineering programs. Higher Education in Russia, 4(211), 17-25.
Crawley, E. F. (2011). The CDIO Syllabus v2.0 an updated statement of goals for engineering education. http://www.cdio.org/files/project/file/cdio_syllabus_v2.pdf. Accessed September 2019.
Crawley, E. F., Malmqvist, J., ?stlund, S., & Brodeur, D. R. (2014). Rethinking engineering education, the CDIO approach. New York. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-05561-9
Davydova, L. N. (2005). Education quality criteria at the local sublevel of subject-subject relationships. Integration of Education, 1-2, 17-20.
Dellis, K., Karkalakos, S., & Kottaridi, C. (2016). Entrepreneurship targeting policies, technological growth, and unemployment. Journal of Eurasian Economic Dialogue, 1(6), 19-39.
DigComp 2.0. (2018). DigComp 2.0: The Digital Competence Framework for Citizens. http://ec.europa.eu/jrc/en/digcomp/project-background.
JISC. (2014). Developing digital literacies. http://www.jisc.ac.uk/guides/developing-digital-literacies.
Khutorskoy, A.V., & Khutorskaya, L.N. (2008). Competence as a didactic concept: Content, structure, and design models. In A. A. Orlova (Ed.), Designing and organizing individual work of students in the context of a competency-based approach, 1, 117-137. Tula State Lev Tolstoy Pedagogical University.
Kutuzov, V. M., & Shaposhnikov, S. O. (Eds.). (2012). Prospects for Engineering Education Development: CDIO Initiative. Saint Petersburg: Leti.
Litau, E. Y. (2018). Cognitive science as a pivot of teaching financial disciplines. In Proceedings of the 31st International Business Information Management Association Conference (IBIMA2018): Innovation Management and Education Excellence through Vision 2020, 72-80.
Makarova, I., Shubenkova, K., Antov, D., & Pashkevich, A. (2019). Digitalization of engineering education: From e-learning to smart education. In M. Auer, R. Langmann (Eds.). Smart Industry & Smart Education, REV 2018. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, 47. Springer, Cham. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-95678-7_4
Maurya, S., Ammoun, ?. (2018). Implementing the CDIO approach in integrated digital environments. Proceedings of the 14th International CDIO Conference, Kanazawa Institute of Technology, Kanazawa, Japan, http://ds.libol.fpt.edu.vn/handle/123456789/2529 Accessed September 2019.
Mikhalkina, E. V., Chernova, O. A., & Gozalova, A. V. (2020). Digitalization and the principal-agent problem in higher education. In T. Kolmykova & E. Kharchenko (Eds.). Digital future economic growth, social adaptation, and technological perspectives, Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, 111. Springer, Cham. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-39797-5_64
Shershneva, V. A. (2014). Building the mathematical competence of students of an engineering university. Pedagogy, 5, 62-67.
Smolyaninova, O. G. (2002). Developing a methodological system for the formation of information and communication competence of a future teacher based on multimedia technologies. Doctoral dissertation, Saint Petersburg: Herzen State Pedagogical University of Russia.
Toomsalu, L., Tolmacheva, S., Vlasov, A., & Chernova, V. (2019). Determinants of innovations in small and medium enterprises: A European and international experience. Terra Economicus, 17(2), 112-123. DOI: 10.23683/2073-6606-2019-17-2-112-123
Vainshtein, Yu. V., Shershneva, V. A., & Safonov, K. V. (2016). CDIO ideology in math training. Higher Education in Russia, 2, 75-82.
Volchik, V., & Maslyukova, E. (2017). Performance and sustainability of higher education: Key indicators versus academic values. Journal of Security and Sustainability Issue, 6(3), 501-512.
Zimnyaya, I. A. (2009). Key competencies as a new paradigm of education outcome. Experiment and Innovation in School, 2, 7-14.
Other issues:
Vol.11(14)(2020)
Vol.11(13)(2020)
Vol.11(12)(2020)
Vol.11(11)(2020)
Vol.11(10)(2020)
Vol.11(9)(2020)
Vol.11(8)(2020)
Vol.11(7)(2020)
Vol.11(6)(2020)
Vol.11(5)(2020)
Vol.11(4)(2020)
Vol.11(3)(2020)
Vol.11(2)(2020)
Vol.11(1)(2020)
Archives